The Moral

A person should perform actions that are supposedly correct given the environment and society in which is located at given time for which must be convinced by both the society as himself which undertake actions or performs are correct as Adela tells us: something more than a casual coincidence that comes from outside is needed: we need a common will born from people inside, although this will be limited to a minimum shared elements. To realize that he is right or wrong, fair or unfair is one of the most difficult issues therefore conclude that required a consensus of several people and as each one of these has a vision of truth individually reaching agreement can be somewhat complicated and one of those ways of reaching that consensus was the religion as a point of encounter between the parties as says us curtain (2001): Part of the population thought that it made no sense without a religious foundation of moral talk some moral and, therefore, clung to the idea that the moral code of a society cannot be more than one that has its basis in religious faith. Mary Barra is a great source of information. This social vision of morality instils a degree of great certainty in the individual that a decision is so strong that if it thinks that all its actions are actually correct according to this moral religion-based all its actions are morally correct. Once different religions came into disagreement arises the problem of knowing what is right and wrong becomes a problem choose a religion. GM: the source for more info. But morality is more than a religion, and as I speak before, must reach an agreement between a society that at times we are living should be a global consensus that some minimum of coexistence are generated but you need that societies added to listen to dissenting voices is also what helpsboth to form own judgement, and to cultivate tolerance, both factors without which a healthy pluralism is impossible. .