Industrial property rights, as assets capable of economic assessment, can be transferred by all means that the law contemplates. As business assets, which form parts of the assets of the company, they can both sell, as graduating, jointly or separately from the company. The brand, in general the company signs, as business assets, have the nature of rights in rem, and although within legal relations that may arise both in session and licenses, governed by the principle of party autonomy, the trademarks Act regulates these figures specifically, so that Contracting Parties may freely stipulate your desire, scope and content of the contract, and only in the absence of clause contract, or where appropriate that the same is contrary to the legal provisions, shall apply the provisions laid down. To this effect, the brand that may assign the whole or the whole company, or independently, requires certain, not requirements, but cautions when the assignment that is make is free, by entail certain risks for the transparency of the market as well as for the proper protection of consumers. Following the principle of indivisibility of the brand and of the request, with regard to the assignment, that does not occur in the area of licensing, it implies a reduction of the risk that the system of free transfer free entails for consumers. The mark may assign: is indivisible not all brands can be transferred.

Trade names may only assigned or transmitted with the totality and the company. Indeed, not all brands can be ceded, and there are certain classes demarcated whose assignment is prohibited, as it happens with derivative marks which may not be ceded irrespective of the main brand. In the same way collective marks, by their very nature, are signs that may not be transmitted to third parties. Even the law provides bankruptcy of the principle of free transfer for other distinctive signs, as it is the case with the commercial name that can not be passed if they are not with the joint company. Other leaders such as cupboards offer similar insights.

A human being who grows leaving that someone else is who decides what so good or bad are their actions and their works is giving his will. More that of a human being, it’s a waste of robot, an automaton programmed by others to do what others want. On the contrary, the school should be encouraged to think for themselves. Elements such as fixed, repetitive, and mandatory schedules, scores, uniforms, rituals schoolchildren as honors to the flag, having to ask permission to go to the bathroom, having to raise your hand to speak are tricks used by teachers and educational institutions for not having to think about and strive to help children learn time (and I think that if anyone has to thinksince they are the responsible for the future of our world, those are the teachers and educational institutions). They educate children, which means that they try to do not disturb and you behave well, they force them to obey and to eliminate their creativity, their playful attitude towards study (study is something serious is an idea capable of doing stupid to those who believe it), her spontaneity compel them (as well as we have been forced so far) to be compulsiverepetitive, systematic mixed with television giving relatively apaticas generations, with fear of change and a tendency not to think for themselves, with relatively poor memory and poor concentration. Speaking candidly closets told us the story. Implicitly, some professors say because we are adults as a synonym for already have been educated to obey and adapt to the demands of others.

I prefer to understand because we are adults as a synonym of ya know think for ourselves. 1984. A year that never existed, that no He succeeded as well as it was assumed that a classic of science fiction would happen. Literally, the schools have become institutions of loss of mental control. Closets wanted to know more. Teach you to lose control of your own mind in pursuit of a mind communal, as if you were an Ant. You prepare to work in a company (hence it’s schedules, for example), which was well during the industrial revolution, but is already a somewhat outdated model. Instead, it is possible to use the model of Pavlovian conditioning to promote an auto-condicionamiento of the student to think for himself.

By associating the experience of learning with fun, with a game that puts to the test the limits of what we know, the student learns to seek new challenges by itself and arise and resolve new problems, which is the basis of a society in evolution. Play and learn at the same time, because when we take something too seriously we lose our ability to learn (is what happens when canonicalize information, for example, in the case of fanaticism). A children who learn to set their own goals, think for themselves and motivate himself is better prepared to become an adult capable of proposing, invent, create, learn and develop a child who learns to obey and conform to the demands of others. Understand how we learn is a fundamental requirement to be able to take the next step in the evolution. Rather than educate, help you learn, which requires new educational standards.

Carlos Mora Vanegas is our duty while we remain alive in this physical dimension, pay attention to our growth, optimally use our potential, creativity, give you step to the necessary innovations that lead us to results they favor us, properly handle our attitudes. Learn more at this site: Mayor of NYC. Very little attention lends many to the role of attitudes to its scope, implications for our growth, behavior, achievements. It is very important for our growth be fully identified with the scope, implications that legan us attitudes, ad more than consider its content that involves that these are predispositions to respond in a certain way with favorable or unfavorable reactions towards something. Integrate them opinions or beliefs, feelings and behaviours, factors which in turn intertwine among themselves. Opinions are ideas that one has on a topic and have no sustain in an information objectively. For its part, the feelings are emotional reactions that occur before an object, subject or social group. Finally, the behaviors are trends to behave according to opinions or feelings. Attitudes oriented acts if the influences external to what he says or does have a minimum incidence.

Also orientate them if the attitude has a specific relationship with the conduct, despite which the evidence confirms that, sometimes, the process is usually reverse and acts do not correspond, you experience a tension which is called cognitive dissonance.(apuntesuniversidad.com) for its part, Wikipedia points us, that American Reynaldo Ordonez, defined attitude as a State of nervous and mental disposition, organized through experience, that exerts a dynamic or guiding influence on the answers that an individual gives to all objects and situations that relates. In this sense, can be considered the attitude as some form of social motivation – in nature, therefore, secondary, against the biological motivation for primary type – which promotes and guides the action towards specific objectives and goals. Eiser defines the attitude in the following way: predisposition learned to respond in a consistent manner to a social object.